Skip to main content

Reading



This book has got to be one of the best business books I’ve ever read. Is it because it’s exciting, thrilling, and make you sit at the edge of your Starbucks lounge-lizard-by-the-fireplace seat? Nope. Is it filled with witty euphimisms, or witty anything? Hardly. Does it make me want to be a better man, business- or otherwise? Um… no.

Why is it, perhaps, the best business book on the planet, then?

Because it tells you, analytically, without apology, when your “great idea” either stinks or has the potential to rule the world (for a short time anyway).

Kim Mauborgne writes this book like a textbook from college. It’s not that difficult to read, it’s just really REALLY dry. The thing is, that kind of stuff gets me going. I was the kid in school who wanted to read those big thick strategy textbooks. So, after the first few chapters, this thing really hit me.

By the time I wrote all my notes, made drafts which I will now fill out when I come up with my “brilliant ideas” prior to running with them, and analyzed all my previous projects, businesses, and companies I worked for, I hadn’t even hit the good stuff yet.

Want the juice? Read Appendix B. “Value Innovation, A Reconstructionist View of Strategy”.

Let me just give you a snippit to whet your appetite.

To reconstructionist eyes, however, the strategic challenge looks very different. Recognizing that structure and market boundaries exist only in managers’ minds, practitioners who hold this view do not let existing market structures limit their thinking. To them, extra demand is out there, largely untapped. The crux of the problem is how to create it. This, in turn, requires a shift of attention from supply to demand, from a focus on competing to a focus on value innovation — that is, the creation of innovative value to unlock new demand. ….

We have seeen in the example of Cirque du Soleil a focus on the demand side, whereas recombination is about recombining existing technologies or productive means, often focusing on the supply side. The basic building blocks for reconstruction are buyer value elements that reside across existing industry boundaries. They are not technologies nor methods of production.

By focusing on the supply side, recombination tends to seek an innovative solution to the existing problem. Looking at the demand side, in contrast, reconstruction breaks away from the cognitive bounds set by existing rules of competition. It focuses on redefining the existing problem itself. Cirque du Soleil, for example, is not about offering a better circus by recombining existing knowledge or technologies about acts and performances. Rather, it is about reconstructing existing buyer value elements to create a new form of entertainment that offers the fun and thrill of the circus with the intellectual sophistication of the theater. Redefining the problem usually leads to changes in the entire system and hence a shift in strategy, whereas recombination may end up finding new solutiosn to subsystem activities that serve to reinforce an existing strategic position.

To throw some gun powder on the fire (is this exciting or what!!!?), reading Appendix A, which is really a shortened summary of the entire book using witty examples and stories, solidifies the necessity to put the freaking book down and go do something about your ideas.

Now go already! Buy the book. Read it. And, make blue oceans! (Not yellow ones.)

By and large, you walk away from this book feeling empowered, inspired and challenged to create value that would make your competitors irrelevant. I personally found it to be a really great business book and very thought inspiring. A must-read for everyone involved in running a business.

Pena Tumpul - Should have read the book long time ago

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pahat

O rang tua-tua selalu mengingatkan kita, kalau hendak berjaya jangan sama sekali bersikap seperti pahat dengan penukul. Sikap pahat yang hanya akan berkerja apabila diketuk sebenarnya banyak berlaku dalam kehidupan seharian kita. Kebijaksanaan silam itu mahu memberitahu kita bahawa dalam apa kerja sekalipun, desakan atau keterpaksaan tidak akan menjanjikan kejayaan. Apabila membuat kerja apabila dipaksa, maka selamanya kita memerlukan ``ketukan'' supaya sekian banyak ``pahat'' membuat kerja masing-masing. Adakalanya Haziq juga bagai pahat. Saya pula penukul. Mahu diketuk selalu. Perlu juga sering diingatkan disuruh. untuk buat itu dan ini, walaupun apa yang perlu dibuat itu sebenarnya tidak perlu sampai disuruh pun. Kebanyakannya adalah rutin yang sudah sering sangat dilakukan. Mengulangkaji pelajaran misalnya tidaklah sampai perlu diulang-ulang diberitahu untuk melakukannya. Ia adalah kewajipan seorang pelajar kalau ingin berjaya. Sekali disuruh, sekali d

Mirip

Panas? Gambar hiasan sahaja. B iasa sangat kita dengar orang kata kalau anak perempuan mirip rupa ayah, sejuk. Apa yang sejuk itulah yang sampai kini saya kurang pasti jawapannya. Barangkali rumahtangga yang sejuk. Rumahtangga ayah dan ibu akan sentiasa aman bahagia tanpa sengketa mungkin. Dan, kalau anak lelaki mirip wajah ibunya, dikatakan juga rumahtangga yang dibina akan turut sejuk. Sebaliknya kalau anak perempuan mewarisi wajah ibu dan anak lelaki mirip paras bapanya berkemungkinan rumah tangga akan panas. Akan selalu berlaku sengketa. Sejauh mana benarkah kenyataan yang tiada data-data empirikal ini? Cakap-cakap kosong ini cuma disebarkan dari mulut orang-orang tua dahulu dan ia terus tersebar dari satu generasi ke satu generasi dan tidak sangat perlu untuk dipercayai pun. Saya melihat kesejahteraan sesebuah bahtera rumah tangga banyak bergantung kepada bagaimana ia dikemudi oleh nakhodanya berpandukan kompas iman dan diterima dengan senang hati oleh ahli-ahli bahteranya. Itu

Roda

" H idup ini ibarat putaran roda yang menyaksikan kita tidak selalunya berada di atas. Ada ketikanya kita akan berada di bawah, kemudian naik semula dan turun lagi silih berganti." Saya menemui kisah yang sangat menarik ini. Ada ibrah. Peringatan juga ketika kita adakalanya lalai dan alpa. Alkisah, ketika sepasang suami isteri sedang menikmati sajian makan tengahari, muncul seorang pengemis berpakaian lusuh meminta belas kasihan mereka. ''Tolonglah Encik ,saya lapar ,sejak semalam tidak menjamah sesuap nasi.'' Dengan muka bengis,si suami sambil menjeling isteri yang cantik terus menghalau dan menengking si pengemis itu . Dalam hatinya berkata ''Aku membina perniagaan hingga berjaya bukan untuk orang lain,tapi untuk diri dan keluargaku.' ' Si isteri tidak dapat berbuat apa-apa dengan sikap suaminya walaupun dalam hatinya ada niat untuk bersedekah. Beberapa tahun kemudian, perniagaan si suami jatuh muflis dan dia menjadi miskin. Dia terus